Catalyst home

University of Arizona

Architectural Switching in Protein Evolution

by Matt Cordes, PhD

Proteins are the workhorse molecules of living cells, performing an incredibly diverse array of signalling and housekeeping tasks. As a consequence, most pharmaceutical targets are proteins, and most genetic diseases involve mutations that cause protein defects. The functional versatility of proteins derives in part from an architectural versatility: there are hundreds of different basic kinds of protein structures that serve as scaffolds for various activities. A protein's architecture is also called its "fold" and is composed of helix, ribbon and loop elements linked together in a certain order and placed in a certain spatial arrangement.
graphic of a protein

It is useful to picture the collection of protein architectures in a particular cell or organism as the beautiful skyline of a huge city. Hundreds of different structures are present, but a given protein generally has a single fold, much in the way that a given building has a single unchanging architecture that makes up one part of a colorful view. The blueprints for assembling a given protein's fold correctly are encoded in the amino-acid sequence, which in turn is encoded in the nucleotide sequence of its gene. Like buildings, protein structures can be demolished or weakened by removing key architectural supports, such as might occur through mutations in the sequence. They may also tolerate some small architectural additions or minor modifications. But once a building is up, the basic architecture doesn't usually change radically over its lifetime, and traditional views of how protein structures behave and evolve are similarly conservative and static. If developers want to put up a more modern building on the space occupied by an old one, they usually knock it down and start over rather than try to twist what's already there into a new shape (unless it has some sentimental or historic value, like Boston's Fenway Park!). Similarly, it is thought to be fairly difficult to reshape existing proteins and still have them work correctly and maintain structural integrity.

But lately this analogy, while useful, has been under some strain. For one thing, a whole group of diseases, which include Alzheimer's and "Mad Cow", has been identified which involve "misfolding" events including radical architectural changes in proteins. It's also clear that some proteins, for example molecular motors or bacterial pore forming toxins, are incredibly structurally dynamic in the course of going about their normal business. Finally, the evolution of protein structure, once thought to be fairly uneventful, is showing itself to be more complex and dynamic than once realized.

In the April issue of the journal Structure, Arizona BMB researchers Tracey Newlove, Jay Konieczka and Matt Cordes reported the discovery of a radical architectural switching event in the evolution of a family of small DNA-binding proteins. They used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) to determine the structure of a protein called P22 Cro, and then compared it to that of a cousin called lambda Cro. The two proteins are very similar in one half but radically different in the other (see picture). In P22 Cro, the renegade half is composed of two helical elements, while in lambda Cro it is composed of a hairpin-like structure.

By comparing these structures to those of very distantly related proteins, Newlove and company determined that the helical structure was the ancestral form, while the hairpin structure arose later by a modification that occurred in one branch of the family. How did this change happen? The replacement of helix by hairpin could have occurred either through a wholesale removal and replacement of half the protein, or by a chameleon-like switching event affecting half the protein's structure. If one were changing half of a building's architecture, one would probably choose the former course, instead of trying to reshape the existing structure. But proteins aren't buildings, and in fact, by a thorough comparison of the amino-acid sequences of members of the Cro family, the Cordes lab researchers showed that the latter model was likely to be correct. These findings reinforce an emerging dynamic view of protein architecture that allows for breathtaking rearrangements during normal function, during the onset of disease, and during evolution.


navigation

Biological Sciences West
P.O. Box 210088 ·Tucson, AZ 85721-0088
Tel: (520) 621-9185 FAX (520) 621-9288
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics

The University of Arizona

September 28. 2004


http://www.biochem.arizona.edu/
All contents copyright ©2001 - 2004. All rights reserved.
richards@email.arizona.edu

Protein Evolution | Talk from Tom | Outreach Update | Time is Tissue | Greenhouses from A to Z
Dr Bourque Fights Bioterrorism | Profiles | Congratulations | Faces | Catalyst Home

Protein Evolution Talk from Tom Outreach Update Time is Tissue Dr Bourque leaves UA to Fight Bioterrorism Profiles Congratulations Faces Catalyst Home Greenhouses from A to Z