 |
Architectural
Switching in Protein Evolution
by
Matt Cordes, PhD
Proteins
are the workhorse molecules of living cells, performing an incredibly
diverse array of signalling and housekeeping tasks. As a consequence,
most pharmaceutical targets are proteins, and most genetic diseases
involve mutations that cause protein defects. The functional
versatility of proteins derives in part from an architectural
versatility: there are hundreds of different basic kinds of
protein structures that serve as scaffolds for various activities.
A protein's architecture is also called its "fold"
and is composed of helix, ribbon and loop elements linked together
in a certain order and placed in a certain spatial arrangement.

It is useful
to picture the collection of protein architectures in a particular
cell or organism as the beautiful skyline of a huge city. Hundreds
of different structures are present, but a given protein generally
has a single fold, much in the way that a given building has a single
unchanging architecture that makes up one part of a colorful view.
The blueprints for assembling a given protein's fold correctly are
encoded in the amino-acid sequence, which in turn is encoded in
the nucleotide sequence of its gene. Like buildings, protein structures
can be demolished or weakened by removing key architectural supports,
such as might occur through mutations in the sequence. They may
also tolerate some small architectural additions or minor modifications.
But once a building is up, the basic architecture doesn't usually
change radically over its lifetime, and traditional views of how
protein structures behave and evolve are similarly conservative
and static. If developers want to put up a more modern building
on the space occupied by an old one, they usually knock it down
and start over rather than try to twist what's already there into
a new shape (unless it has some sentimental or historic value, like
Boston's Fenway Park!). Similarly, it is thought to be fairly difficult
to reshape existing proteins and still have them work correctly
and maintain structural integrity.
But lately
this analogy, while useful, has been under some strain. For one
thing, a whole group of diseases, which include Alzheimer's and
"Mad Cow", has been identified which involve "misfolding"
events including radical architectural changes in proteins. It's
also clear that some proteins, for example molecular motors or bacterial
pore forming toxins, are incredibly structurally dynamic in the
course of going about their normal business. Finally, the evolution
of protein structure, once thought to be fairly uneventful, is showing
itself to be more complex and dynamic than once realized.
In the April issue of the journal Structure, Arizona BMB
researchers Tracey Newlove, Jay Konieczka and Matt Cordes reported
the discovery of a radical architectural switching event in the evolution
of a family of small DNA-binding proteins. They used nuclear magnetic
resonance spectroscopy (NMR) to determine the structure of a protein
called P22 Cro, and then compared it to that of a cousin called lambda
Cro. The two proteins are very similar in one half but radically different
in the other (see picture). In P22 Cro, the renegade half is composed
of two helical elements, while in lambda Cro it is composed of a hairpin-like
structure.
By comparing
these structures to those of very distantly related proteins, Newlove
and company determined that the helical structure was the ancestral
form, while the hairpin structure arose later by a modification that
occurred in one branch of the family. How did this change happen?
The replacement of helix by hairpin could have occurred either through
a wholesale removal and replacement of half the protein, or by a chameleon-like
switching event affecting half the protein's structure. If one were
changing half of a building's architecture, one would probably choose
the former course, instead of trying to reshape the existing structure.
But proteins aren't buildings, and in fact, by a thorough comparison
of the amino-acid sequences of members of the Cro family, the Cordes
lab researchers showed that the latter model was likely to be correct.
These findings reinforce an emerging dynamic view of protein architecture
that allows for breathtaking rearrangements during normal function,
during the onset of disease, and during evolution.
Biological Sciences West
P.O. Box 210088 ·Tucson, AZ 85721-0088
Tel: (520) 621-9185 FAX (520) 621-9288
Department
of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics
The University of Arizona
September 28. 2004
http://www.biochem.arizona.edu/
All contents copyright ©2001 - 2004. All rights reserved.
richards@email.arizona.edu
Protein
Evolution | Talk
from Tom | Outreach
Update | Time
is Tissue | Greenhouses
from A to Z
Dr Bourque Fights
Bioterrorism | Profiles
| Congratulations
| Faces | Catalyst
Home |