Strategy for IGPS Structural Modification |
|||||||||||||
Having chosen two enzymes with similar structure, IGPS and PRAI, Altamirano and colleagues began modifying the amino acid sequence of IGPS to confer upon it the activity of PRAI. Removal of the N-terminal
extension |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||
| Figure 9 The image at right is a superimposed structure comparison between PRAI, shown in pale yellow, and IGPS, shown in blue. The 49 residue extension of IGPS is shown in magenta and has no counterpart in PRAI. | |||||||||||||
![]() |
The
"Gatekeeper" loops There are two other major structural differences between IGPS and PRAI that involve the active site (Figure 10). The extent of the active site exposure is determined by loops b1a1 and b6a6; in PRAI, these loops partially cover the active site, while in IGPS the active site is even less exposed. In PRAI, b1a1 is only four amino acids long, while the corresponding IGPS loop is 15 residues long. b6a6 in both enzymes is 11 residues long, but has a completely different orientation in each enzyme. Furthermore, the b6a6 loop in all PRAI enzymes (species to species) has a highly conserved sequence. |
||||||||||||
| Figure 10 Again, PRAI (light yellow) has been superimposed on IGPS (blue). Loop b1a1 is shown in red; loop b6a6, in orange. The IGPS extension is depicted in magenta. From this angle, the TIM barrel structure of both enzymes is conspicuous. The binding pocket is in the center of the barrel, behind the b1a1 and b6a6 loops. | |||||||||||||
|
Modification of loop b1a1... ... and b6a6 |
|||||||||||||
| Background2 | |||||||||||||
[Overview]
[Background] [Structural Modification] [Selection]
[ivePRAI] [Implications]
[References] [Links] Nikki
Jarrett, 11/20/00 |
|||||||||||||